Photo: Todd Glew remotely triggering a slab on depth hoar while a few boarders look on. After the storm cycle started to kick in, early January 2012.
I started off the winter great; with 16 days surfing and
exploring the rainforests of Costa Rica.
I was counting on
course leading a Level 1 within a few days of returning to the states. When our
season didn’t kick off very quickly with snowfall, I figured it would only be a
matter of time. I was stoked to be in Utah reuniting with friends, meeting new
ones, and the postponed course gave me more time to get extra prepared with the
curriculum.
A few weeks passed, and we made the best of the skiing. One
storm dropped 6-8 inches at best, and continued high pressure dominated as an
inversion caused a thick layer of smog that made living in the Salt Lake City
valley feel like an industrial wasteland.
Skies never lit up down there, but meanwhile up high, the sun shone
brightly. When we had to flat out cancel that same course from its postponed
date, I was bummed.
I got lucky with a few days of guiding work. A family from
Georgia was excited after a day of top rope ice climbing, and planned on going
again the following day for a multi-pitch classic. When temperatures overnight
never hit freezing, and I awoke to a steady rain in the morning, it had to be
called off in the name of safety. Making the call was tough, as it usually
seems at the time. I really needed the money, but climbing wasn’t a wise
decision that day. There was an opportunity to recoup the outing the following
day, but the low temp was forecast to barely hit freezing, and a high of 48 put
the big picture into focus.
Our thin snowpack now consists of an ice crust overlying
extremely weak, advanced facets.
When I saw Scott's name come up on the phone, I realized
he was ringing to give the bad news. Another avalanche course cancellation, or
thinking strongly of it. Scott had recently called Tom Murphy and Brian Lazar
to ask their opinion. Supposedly around 70% of course providers had been straight
up cancelling courses. Others, trying to eke out an existence, continued to run
courses.
So I got to thinking… What is it you need for an avalanche
Level 1 course?
Can it be done all in the classroom, with videos of formal
snowpit tests, videos of “on the fly” tests, videos and powerpoints galore?!
Certainly some things can be shown on video. Even with the best of conditions
and the best of course venues, sometimes folks may just grasp that concept,
test, or technique a bit stronger if they see it first on the big screen, and
then shown it once again out in the field.
But the “avalanche terrain” part of “decision making in
avalanche terrain” states the blunt truth, we teach in the field, and we need
to get them in the field. I’m sure most avalanche educators have contrived
something or other in the field before, just think of a rescue scenario or an
example of skiing one at a time to cross an avalanche path when there is simply
not enough snowpack to run full track. The previous makes for good habits,
right? So a slightly more contrived experiential field day is not such a bad
thing.
Another option is to do as follows; with a willing group you
may be able to teach the classroom portion and the first field day consisting
of rescue and formal snowpit demonstrations. The second day, the “experiential
tour” may be scheduled for later in the season. One downfall to this plan is
the lack of continuity during a course. Will students actually remember all
those things from the first field day and all those power points? Nope, they
don’t anyway. So it is a slightly different experience. You could ask them to
come in early and the instructors can give a quick refresher just to help their
minds get back into the mode.
Of course the most import aspect that has to be strongly
considered with a low snow year is safety. Rocks, stumps, branches and roots
frequent the ground surface, and for a group out there skiing extremely weak
snow, of whom many are beginner skiers, the decision to take that group on a
tour is a big one. Warning of the hazards repeatedly may help, but it is
inevitable that you get one or two agro skiers or boarders who grab all the
speed that the hill and gravity will allow, only to cartwheel into an outcrop of sharp rocks. They may get lucky
and not hit anything. And you may get lucky, or maybe not.
When you know that roughly 70% of the community of educators
are cancelling courses for all the same reasons, then a consensus has been
reached. An unofficial standard.
Bottom line is that we’re guides, and we make critical
decisions all the time. When that decision ends with a much lighter paycheck,
that decision is stressed a bit more. But we can’t let our wallets overcome
good judgment and sound decision making in the name of client safety and client
rewards.
Taking what I can get, it might be time to go for a rock
climb!
Two weeks later… We had run our first avy course with White
Pine Touring, and things began to look up. The snowpack was “historically weak”
consisting of multiple layers of chained up facets. The models had been
consistent at showing a large scale shift in the weather pattern, to a moist
zonal flow with a number of embedded disturbances. It looked like the fire hose was about to be pointed on us, without the invisible shield of a strong high
pressure to block it. Our next avy course was slated for the coming weekend,
but the majority had bailed in hopes for skiing some lift accessed, in bounds
deep powder. And another one bites the dust. The drought may have finally been over,
but the effect of the winter of woes still leaves a dusty taste in my mouth.
No comments:
Post a Comment